Skip to main content

INDC


Ok INDC, it seems to be an easy question (a non-thinker) of course for people who know it.
INDC, Intended, Nationally Determined, it is a sort of compromise reached among countries of the world.
Statement 1, a pledge to rehabilitate refugees, definitely one issue which worth taking a pledge but they have never reached a compromise of that sort. Most of the coastal EU countries are forced to accommodate the refugee not planned or pledged.
Statement 2, to combat climate change - absolutely possible. Climate change has been a pressing issue with a lot of divides north-south, rich-poor and arguments for and against. Hence INDC is a likely compromise.
Statement 3, establishment of a bank, it is a venture, buying shares, there is nothing nationally determined. In most cases, you offered something and you take it.
Statement 4, regarding SDG, it is a very good option.
Now that we are left with option b or d. Look in SDGs we tend to see countries want to perform better, because it is related to hunger, education, health, child mortality etc. Individual countries tend keep ambitious targets. Hence there is no need of a compromise.
In climate change, each and every country has their own reasons and arguments. Hence there is a need of compromise.

So our answer is B
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Masala Bond

Very easy question ‘IFC Masala Bond’ Masala Bond means Indian rupee denominated bond IFC bond- IFC sister to World Bank So answer is C Both 1 and 2
Post a Comment
Read more

Payment Banks

This is a very easy question if you know the concept of a PAYMENT BANK, then is it’s quite factual. If you don’t know, then we will think upon it. Why would RBI conceptualize Payment bank? Obvious answer would be to bring rural population into the banking fold (Banking Inclusion) so that people can park their excess money in the bank and get an interest. At the same time RBI cannot make it like a normal bank. So there will be limitations. If you them directly it would be “non thinker” question. For those who don’t know it, this question that you should not leave but give a calculated guess. So when I read the 2 nd and 3 rd statement I find them contradicting to each other.  Look in 2 nd statement it says it can issue credit cards and in 3 rd it says in it cannot give loan. If a bank can issue a credit card it should be eligible to lend money. Either one of them is correct. 2 and 3 cannot exist together Option D out. Now statement 1 is talking about big players,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bill Lapsing

Firstly we do the word by word analysis, Statement 1 Most important word is PROROGATION. So what is prorogation?  In layman terms Prorogation means ending the entire session of the parliament not any day of the session. Next thing we have to know is that Prorogation is not the end of the house, mostly same MPs will be occupying the seats when they come for the next session. So there is no point in bill lapsing after a PROROGATION (because it is not dissolution) So statement 1 is wrong Statement 2 Most important word is DISSOLUTION of Loksabha. Dissolution means the entire lower house is about to change, new MPs are about to come means new legislations are about to come. Here the bill originated in Rajya Sabha it has not touched the Loksabha. So there is no point in ‘lapsing’ that bill as Rajya Sabha is a permanent house and it can give the same bill to new coming Loksabha. So statement 2 is Correct So our answer is B And thank God they didn’t ...
Post a Comment
Read more