This is a very easy question if you know the
concept of a PAYMENT BANK, then is it’s quite factual.
If you don’t know,
then we will think upon it. Why would RBI conceptualize Payment bank? Obvious
answer would be to bring rural population into the banking fold (Banking
Inclusion) so that people can park their excess money in the bank and get an
interest.
At the same time
RBI cannot make it like a normal bank. So there will be limitations. If you
them directly it would be “non thinker” question. For those who don’t know it,
this question that you should not leave but give a calculated guess.
So when I read
the 2nd and 3rd statement I find them contradicting to
each other. Look in 2nd
statement it says it can issue credit cards and in 3rd it says in it
cannot give loan. If a bank can issue a credit card it should be eligible to
lend money.
Either one of
them is correct. 2 and 3 cannot exist together Option D out.
Now statement 1
is talking about big players, RESIDENT telephone companies and RESIDENT
supermarket companies, now this seems logical from the part of RBI to give the
rights to them because they are Indian residents and money will stay in India and
get invested in India. So logically Statement 1 is correct and if you can
remember some examples to Payment Banks in India like Aditya Birla, Airtel,
Reliance etc. It would be much easier to think.
Look at
statement 2, it says it can issue credit card. So this seems totally wrong
because if a Payment bank can issue credit card too then there is hardly any
difference from the normal bank. Then we are left with only one option that is
B.
Payment banks
cannot undertake lending seems concurrent with limitations, so statement 3 is
correct.
Our answer is B)
1 and 3

Comments
Post a Comment